Mac os x vs ubuntu 12.10

Not even Synaptic can beat that not even the CLI, for by the time you have typed apt-get, I have dragged the program to the Program folder.

10 Reasons why Linux is Better Than MacOS or Windows

The best thing that Apple has ever made, in my opinion, is OS X. Asus A8V Deluxe:: Geforce GT:: Xubuntu September 25th, 4. Manual unzip? Sounds too much of a complication. September 25th, 5. Originally Posted by georgelappies. September 25th, 6. Originally Posted by vexorian. September 26th, 7. Originally Posted by Skara Brae. Whoever came up with the phrase "There is no such thing as a stupid question" obviously never had the internet.

September 26th, 8. Originally Posted by mamamia I clicked page 2 and got one line of text and a bunch of white, and decided to make that the extent of my user experience. Someone on Aug 24, Lots of data, but preciously little information. For example: It might also be some particularly slow library code on Mac OS X, though. Compiler, system overhead due to inefficient code, system overhead because the system also performs other work for example, did the OS index files during some of the runs? With such info, this would have been a great article.

As it stands now, all I conclude from it is that OpenGL is slower under Ubuntu, and that Linux filesystems are faster but there, it would help to know why.


  • mejor navegador para mac os x.
  • 5 Linux Distributions That Look Like MacOS.
  • Ultimate Edition 5.0 Gamers distro released!
  • Why a MacOS user switched to Ubuntu Linux?
  • Why a MacOS user switched to Ubuntu Linux.
  • ?
  • ;

HFS probably is a large part of the explanation, but it also might be that Mac OS ports of various tools do slightly different things, e. By flushing to disk more aggressively. Things like TLB might also affect your performance, at the cost of memory fragmentation.

It's just one of the examples. For example bytes vs 4MB page size: I was just about to try Xubuntu on my MBP, but after seeing those power consumption stats I don't think I can justify it. Sad but true: All these benchmarks are great and all Unless this has changed recently, in which case someone please correct me. Power consumption has been such a big problem on Linux.

Their is no end to it. I'm kind of wondering why you would use a Mac without using OSX. Otherwise you can get a better computer for less money that is more flexible.

https://radisloadworab.cf/pax-hombre-solo-avalanch.php

Mac OS X vs. Ubuntu LTS Performance - Phoronix

Apple laptops are IMHO the best, but let's say among the best in the market. So it is no surprise that Linux users may want one but without osx.


  1. Linux distributions that are inspired by MacOS.
  2. 5 Linux Distributions That Look Like MacOS - It's FOSS;
  3. ;
  4. nazi zombies custom maps mac.
  5. lexmark scanback utility for mac.
  6. making a photo collage on a mac?
  7. Apple notebook notebook hardware cannot be beat. Zero contest from anyone else. CoffeeDregs on Aug 24, Apple [now] uses the same components as everyone else, so I'd be surprised if Apple had significantly different performance. I was primarily pointing out the construction and build quality. Do you run Linux on a macbook? If yes how is it performing? It's also more than fast enough for my use, even the 3d effects in kde4 run fine. The battery-life is a little? If you try to run, say, Ubuntu on a Macbook, you'll notice that you won't be able to do basic things like adjust the fan speed it'll be turned up to the max the entire time and the battery life will thus be horrible, not to mention that the computer will also be insanely hot.

    This is because of the way an alternate OS is installed on Apple hardware - it's actually running on top of a low-level layer that prevents the OS from having proper access to the hardware. The only time I've ever heard of people running into driver issues these days on Linux for basic work is on Apple hardware, and that's the reason.

    So even if you like Apple hardware, you still wouldn't be getting your money's worth running any other OS on it. If you want to run Linux, go for almost any other laptop on the market - you'll get better priced hardware, and the performance will be better. I'm running Ubuntu Also, the fan works fine, and I get between 5 and 8 hours of battery life, depending on what I'm doing.

    Although, as far as gaming performance goes, I haven't actually run any games. I'm not really sure what you mean by "running on top of a low-level layer that prevents the OS from having proper access to the hardware. No rhetorical at all. I've tried to switch to Linux on my macbook a couple of times with disappointing results jumbojet fan noise, magma hot, etc. I am looking for success stories to motivate me for the next switch. Most of this is not true.

    At all. ImprovedSilence on Aug 24, I love my linux for developing, but no other laptops come close to touching my air when it comes to aesthetics. It is subjective, you're right. My reason is because I like the look and feel of the machine. I suspect many others but not everybody Great hardware is worth a good amount of money. As someone with a macpro version 1 tower, I can be heartened that I can install the latest Linux, even though apple no longer supports my machine with its OS upgrades.

    Its only a matter of time and lack of security updates I agree with the rest of the responses you are bound to receive—Apple laptops are pretty solid machines, they easily run multiple operating systems including but not limited to the respectable OSX , I'm a nerd so "why not play with even more toys? Just because OSX only runs on Mac hardware doesn't mean that's the only reason to use it as you assume.

    It has a logo of a bitten pear.

    Head-to-Head Desktop Comparison: Ubuntu 12.10 vs. OS X Mountain Lion

    But 3 years back, Pear OS suddenly announced its demise. It is clearly inspired by MacOS. The bottom plank is not the only thing that you can relate to MacOS. Look at the Geary, Photos, Scratch and other apps. They have a Mac feel despite being so elementary-ish. Do keep in mind that they are not just putting a MacOS looking theme on the top of Ubuntu.

    They are doing some serious work to give the entire OS an elementary feel. If you want a Linux that has a Mac feel but provides a great community support, elementary OS should be the first choice. Deepin Linux was initially based on Ubuntu but it now uses Debian as its base. They have created their own desktop environment along with a range of other Deepin specific applications that blend perfectly to give you an aesthetic feel.

    Installation of the Operating System

    As you can see in the video above, Deepin Linux is undoubtedly one of the most beautiful Linux distribution ever. The Deepin team is based in China and their primary target is Chinese audience and hence some of their applications are not available in other languages. This is an area where they can certainly improve. BackSlash Linux is relatively new and relatively unknown entrant in the Linux distribution world.

    It is based on Ubuntu and follows a release cycle similar to Ubuntu. While it is available for a free download, you also have the option to buy support.

    Re: Give me one reason why Mac OS X is better than Ubuntu...

    Unlike the above mentioned MacOS look alike Linux distributions, Gmac is not a full-fledged distribution. Gmac already does it for you. Plus you get to keep your Ubuntu distribution. There is not enough information available about Trenta OS at this time. Focus has been kept on the looks and UI.